The following is an opinion about a class reading assignment.
I felt that what Didion focused on pertained more to me in this time of my life; "one of the mixed blessings of being twenty and twenty-one and even twenty-three is the conviction that nothing like this, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding, has ever happened to anyone before." I am at a time in my life where I feel like my problems are and have ever been/will be solely conquered by me. No one else has gone through what I have. But we all know that is not true. So much of what she said resonated with me: overstaying your welcome in a place, realizing that what we believe to be glamourous is not so, and the feeling that mistakes you make when you are young simply disappear when you leave your current location. I liked that she admitted that change was needed, and while she experienced despair, which we may not all face, she took it on with courage and moved away with her husband. I don't feel the sense that she longs for New York any longer. She spent her time there, and Los Angeles is her new haven. I admired that, even though she enjoys LA, she cannot give a straight answer as to why the chose the west coast as their new home after New York. They are vastly different worlds–but she says that time is no factor. LA feels right now, New York is her past.
Unfortunately, I was not as much a fan of Rodriguez's work. Although I think that his essay had some strong moments, especially the ending, I felt a disconnect at the beginning of the piece. Nearing its close, I realized the essay was strongly commenting on AIDS, and I think that he portrayed the disease well. It was altogether sad and a little overwhelming but also beautiful. One thing I did enjoy very early in the essay was his description of his parents' views of the west coast, specifically how easterners moving west have a "sense of running from the past–the darkening time zone, the lowering curtain " I thought that was brilliant. What I did find interesting was that I could not tell from his tone what his opinion was of homosexuality. I gathered that he was gay, but I did not feel that he had a positive outlook on his sexuality or the community he lived in. Perhaps I misread the piece, but I think that that uncertainty is what caused my mixed feelings about the work.